Logo-dht
Digital Health Trends. 2025;2(1): 23-33.
doi: 10.34172/dhtj.10
  Abstract View: 36
  PDF Download: 14

Systematic Review

Chatbots and Virtual Health Assistants in Healthcare: From Initial Triage to Patient Follow-up

Mandana Akbari Marandi 1* ORCID logo, Reza Shoja Ghiass 2

1 Deggendorf Institute of Technology, Bavaria, Germany
2 Synapsis Health AI, Ontario, Canada
*Corresponding Author: Mandana Akbari Marandi, Email: Makbarimarandi@gmail.com

Abstract

Background: Chatbots and virtual health assistants (VHAs) are emerging tools in healthcare, supporting triage, symptom assessment, diagnosis, follow-up, treatment adherence, and remote monitoring. Despite the rapid adoption, comprehensive evidence on their effectiveness, limitations, and clinical utility is limited. Thus, this review evaluates current evidence regarding their applications, performance, and impact across the patient care continuum.

Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science (2010–2025) identified studies on chatbots and VHAs in healthcare. Eligible studies addressed triage, symptom checking, diagnosis support, follow-up, treatment adherence, and remote monitoring. The extracted data covered design, sample size, artificial intelligence (AI) architecture, platform, usability, engagement, and outcomes. Study quality was assessed using Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). Given heterogeneous designs and outcomes, a narrative synthesis approach was employed to summarize the findings.

Results: Forty-six studies from 17 countries were identified, including randomized controlled trials, cross-sectional studies, pilot projects, and retrospective analyses. The reported diagnostic accuracy ranged from 33% to 93%. Usability was high (SUS 68–85), with strong potential to enhance engagement, adherence, and access to care, especially in chronic disease and mental health management. Large language model-based and retrieval-augmented systems outperformed traditional rule-based chatbots in complex tasks. Limitations included short follow-ups, simulated cases, inconsistent evaluation metrics, and scarce evidence of long-term impact.

Conclusion: Chatbots and VHAs represent effective complementary healthcare tools, improving patient support, workflow efficiency, and accessibility, although they should not be independently used in diagnostic/therapeutic decision-making. Future research should emphasize large-scale real-world evaluations, standardized metrics, long-term outcomes, and secure, patient-centered implementations.



First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View:

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download:

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Full Text View:

Your browser does not support the canvas element.


Submitted: 09 Sep 2025
Revision: 01 Nov 2025
Accepted: 12 Nov 2025
ePublished: 22 Nov 2025
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)